12.2 Types and features of audit evidence (sufficiency, reliability and relevance)
Audit evidence refers to the information obtained by auditors during an audit to support their conclusions and opinions. There are various types of audit evidence that auditors may gather, including:
- Documentary Evidence:
- Physical documents: This includes invoices, contracts, bank statements, purchase orders, shipping documents, and other written records.
- Electronic documents: This includes electronic files, emails, database records, and other digital records.
- External Confirmations:
- Written responses from third parties: Auditors may send confirmation requests to banks, customers, suppliers, lenders, or other relevant third parties to verify the accuracy of certain information.
- Internal Records and Documents:
- Accounting records: This includes general ledger, subsidiary ledgers, journals, and other accounting books and records maintained by the entity.
- Internal control documentation: This includes policies, procedures, manuals, and other documents related to the entity’s internal control system.
- Observations:
- Physical observations: Auditors may observe physical inventory counts, production processes, control activities, or other relevant operations.
- Process walkthroughs: Auditors may walk through specific processes to understand and assess the internal controls in place.
- Inquiries and Interviews:
- Discussions with management: Auditors may interview management or other personnel within the organization to gain an understanding of processes, transactions, and controls.
- External expert opinions: Auditors may seek opinions or advice from external experts, such as legal counsel or valuation specialists.
- Analytical Procedures:
- Trend analysis: Auditors may analyze financial data over multiple periods to identify significant fluctuations, trends, or anomalies.
- Ratio analysis: Auditors may calculate and compare financial ratios to assess the reasonableness and consistency of financial information.
- Benchmarking: Auditors may compare the entity’s financial performance or key indicators to industry averages or similar companies.
- Physical Inspection:
- Physical examination of assets: Auditors may physically inspect inventory, fixed assets, cash, or other tangible assets to verify their existence and condition.
- Reperformance:
- Independent execution of controls: Auditors may perform procedures or control activities that were originally performed by the entity to assess their effectiveness and accuracy.
- Recalculation: Auditors may independently recalculate financial calculations, such as interest expense, depreciation, or inventory valuation, to verify their accuracy.
The features of audit evidence refer to the qualities and characteristics that determine its reliability, relevance, sufficiency, and persuasiveness in supporting the auditor’s conclusions and opinions. Here are the key features of audit evidence:
- Relevance: Audit evidence should be directly related to the assertions being tested. It should provide information that is pertinent to the financial statements and the specific audit objectives.
- Sufficiency: Audit evidence should be adequate in quantity and quality to support the auditor’s conclusions. It should be of sufficient scope and depth to provide a reasonable basis for forming an opinion.
- Reliability: Audit evidence should be reliable, meaning it should be credible and trustworthy. Reliable evidence is obtained from independent and objective sources and is free from bias, manipulation, or significant errors.
- Objectivity: Audit evidence should be objective, meaning it should be based on verifiable facts and observations rather than personal opinions or judgments. It should be obtained and evaluated in an unbiased and impartial manner.
- Competence and Independence of the Provider: The provider of audit evidence should be competent and have the necessary knowledge, expertise, and qualifications to provide reliable information. The evidence is more reliable when it comes from independent sources that are free from conflicts of interest.
- Timeliness: Audit evidence should be obtained within a reasonable timeframe. The information should be current and relevant to the period under audit to ensure its accuracy and applicability.
- Consistency: Audit evidence should be consistent with other available evidence. Consistency enhances the reliability and credibility of the evidence and helps identify any discrepancies or inconsistencies that require further investigation.
- Authenticity: Audit evidence should be authentic and verifiable. It should be traced back to its original source and supported by appropriate documentation or corroborating evidence.
- Originality: Original documents and records are generally considered more reliable than copies. Whenever possible, auditors prefer to obtain original documents or obtain certified copies.
- Completeness: Audit evidence should be comprehensive and cover all material aspects relevant to the audit objectives. It should provide a complete and balanced picture of the financial statements and the underlying transactions and events.